Higher Defense Spending: A Catalyst for Europe, Trump’s Chaos: A Deterrent for the U.S.
Europe is still searching for the right strategy to counter Trump’s shock-and-awe tactics. The White House’s rapid and erratic policy shifts make it difficult for Europe to move beyond crisis management into a more comprehensive, proactive approach—one that mitigates short-term risks while turning vulnerabilities into strategic advantages.
Strategic Investments: Turning Pressure into Growth
If managed wisely and coordinated across the continent, higher defense spending could stimulate economic growth rather than becoming a chaotic burden on individual nations. Joint investments in defense industries, research, and production would:
- Create jobs and drive innovation,
- Strengthen Europe’s strategic autonomy,
- Reduce reliance on unpredictable U.S. policies.
Meanwhile, Trump’s unpredictability risks the opposite for the U.S.—economic stagnation, fractured alliances, and domestic turmoil. History offers a lesson: Herbert Hoover’s policies helped trigger the Great Depression. As Karl Marx quipped, history repeats itself—first as tragedy, then as farce. Yet this farce has real consequences: millions facing death, poverty, instability, and isolation—all because of one man’s whims.
Suffice it to look at how the markets have reacted since Trump entered the White House. This is a real guide to how Europe should read the future and navigate its policies towards Trump’s US.
Support Independent Analysis
Help us keep delivering free, unbiased, and in-depth insights by supporting our work. Your donation ensures we stay independent, transparent, and accessible to all. Join us in preserving thoughtful analysis—donate today!
Europe’s Contributions to U.S. Military Presence
Europe must also dispel the false narrative that it enjoys a free security guarantee from U.S. forces stationed on the continent. Germany, Poland, and Romania all contribute to the cost of hosting U.S. troops through host nation support (HNS) agreements, which cover infrastructure, logistics, and indirect costs:
- Germany provides around $1 billion annually, including funding for bases, housing, and training areas.
- Poland has significantly increased spending since 2019, committing over $2 billion for military infrastructure to accommodate U.S. forces.
- Romania, while on a smaller scale, has invested in upgrades like Mihail Kogălniceanu Air Base, though the U.S. still covers most operational costs.
While the U.S. incurs substantial expenses, this is far from a free security pass. Europe must not tolerate double standards—especially with a war raging in Ukraine and Putin openly seeking to subjugate Eastern Europe. The U.S. must decide: Is it truly an ally, or does it prefer to do business with Europe’s adversary, Russia? Either way, Europe can and will adapt.
How to Respond to Trump and Musk
Both Trump and Musk buckle under firm resistance. They fear backlash—especially from their own economic and political base.
Take Musk’s recent Starlink debacle: After threatening to cut service to Ukraine, he faced swift condemnation from Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski, followed by Marco Rubio’s half-hearted defense. By the end of the day, Musk backtracked: No, I never intended to disrupt Starlink. Of course not—only an idiot alienates paying clients, especially when Poland foots part of the bill.
Trump behaves the same way. His bluster is loud but fragile.
He may threaten steep tariffs on Europe, but the moment he faces real pushback, he delays their enforcement. Why? Because the economic backlash would hit not just the White House, but American voters. The One Hundred Days Free Pass is about to expire.
Europe’s Decisive Move: The Ultimate Pressure Point
Europe’s implicit threat to shift away from U.S. arms would strike at the heart of the American defense industry. The political risks are undeniable:
- Germany’s F-35 concerns – Intelligence fears over vulnerabilities in U.S. systems.
- F-16 restrictions – Washington limiting defense capabilities for Ukraine and allies.
- False “favor” narrative – The U.S. sells weapons at premium prices, not as charity.
- Unreliable leadership – Trump’s unpredictability makes long-term defense planning impossible.
Why This Works:
- Europe is on track to become America’s #1 arms market – If trends hold, it will surpass the Middle East within a decade.
- A shift to European, Japanese, or South Korean alternatives would send shock waves through the U.S. defense industry.
- The Pentagon and arms lobby won’t tolerate losing $70 billion+ in annual sales, with room to double.
Three months of serious signals from Europe, and the White House will fold. The economic reality is stronger than Trump’s bluster.
The Energy Card: A Strategic Play
Energy policy offers another powerful lever. The European Commission could propose a long-term deal to purchase 60 billion cubic meters of U.S. LNG at a negotiated price. This would:
- Leverage U.S. Industry Against Trump – American energy giants and defense contractors would pressure Trump to maintain stable trade with Europe, rather than sabotaging transatlantic ties.
- Challenge Trump’s Russia Narrative – If Trump obstructs U.S. LNG exports, he would have to explain why he’s effectively pushing Europe back toward Russian gas—a contradiction to his supposed hardline stance on Moscow.
- Ensure Energy Security – Locking in a stable LNG supply at predictable prices would reduce volatility, limiting Russia’s ability to use energy as a geopolitical weapon.
- Drive a Wedge in U.S. Politics – This would force Trump to navigate internal conflicts between his isolationist stance and powerful U.S. corporate interests that benefit from transatlantic trade.
Turning Trump’s Tactics Against Him
In essence, using Trump’s own economic logic against him—profit-driven deal-making—could expose the contradictions in his policies and prevent him from weaponizing security and energy dependence.
Europe has the leverage—it just needs to use it. Turn Trump’s own tactics against him and strike where it hurts most—his ego and his bottom line.
Ilian Vassilev
